Modular revision for polyethylene insert wear 28 years later after primary total hip arthroplasty: a clinical case
https://doi.org/10.17238/2226-2016-2025-1-59-66
Abstract
Introduction. Osteolysis caused by polyethylene wear debris remains a leading cause of revision total hip arthroplasty, particularly in young and active patients.
Purpose of the study - to present a clinical case of a successful long-term (28 years) total hip arthroplasty performed on a 27-year-old patient. The key factors for the success of the primary endoprosthesis were the correct positioning of the components and the use of a ceramic-cross-linked polyethylene friction couple. In addition, an algorithm for revision interventions for inlay wear and periprosthetic osteolysis is presented.
Materials and Methods. A 55-year-old male patient came to the clinic with complaints of pain in the area of the right hip joint, which increased with loading. From the anamnesis it is known that in 1996, at the age of 27, the patient underwent primary total hip replacement of the right hip joint for aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. At the follow-up examination, the patient was found to have pain syndrome. The Harris scale score was 45 points. Radiographs and CT scans showed signs of head decentration in the acetabulum and extensive zones of periacetabular osteolysis.
Results. One year after surgery, the patient walks without a limp, assessing the result of the revision treatment as excellent. The amplitude of passive movements: extension/flexion 5°/0°/120°, abduction/adduction 30°/0°/30°, external/internal rotation 30°/0°/30°. The functional assessment of the joint according to the Harris scale was 90 points. On control radiographs, the position of the endoprosthesis components was correct, the periacetabular osteolytic defect was filled with allogenic bone.
Conclusions. This case highlights the importance of accurate component positioning and optimal bearing couple selection for achieving long-term success in total hip arthroplasty. Isolated replacement of modular components with bone grafting of an osteolytic defect may be a justifiable choice of surgical management for inlay wear and osteolysis, provided the components are stable in fixation
Keywords
About the Authors
S. A. LasunskiiRussian Federation
Sergej Anatol’evich Lasunskij – Candidate of Medical Science, orthopaedic traumatologist, Head of Traumatology and Orthopaedics Department No. 7
Saint-Petersburg, 195427
D. V. Stafeev
Russian Federation
Dmitrij Viktorovich Stafeev – Candidate of Medical Science, orthopaedic traumatologist, Head of the Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Saint-Petersburg, 195427
M. S. Magomedov
Russian Federation
Magomed Shamilovich Magomedov – clinical resident of the Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Saint-Petersburg, 195427
D. V. Special'nyj
Russian Federation
Denis Vladimirovich Special’nyj – traumatologist-orthopaedic surgeon of Traumatology and Orthopaedics Department No.7
Saint-Petersburg, 195427
A. O. Denisov
Russian Federation
Aleksej Olegovich Denisov – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Doctor of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Department of Knee Joint Pathology No.10, Deputy Director for Research and Education
Saint-Petersburg, 195427
D. V. Chugaev
Russian Federation
Dmitrij Valer’evich Chugaev – Candidate of Medical Sciences, doctor of traumatology and orthopaedics, Department of Knee Joint Pathology No.10
Saint-Petersburg, 195427
References
1. Learmonth I.D., Young C., Rorabeck C., The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007 Oct 27;370(9597):1508-19. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7. PMID: 17964352.
2. Sineokii A.D., Chugaev D.V., Shubnyakov I.I., Pliev D.G., Gudz A.I., Karpuhin A.S., Lasunskii S.A., Semiotics and problems of terminology for pathological conditions associated with total hip arthroplasty Genij Ortopedii. 2019;25(3):393-399. DOI: 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-3-393-399.
3. Pivec R., Johnson A.J., Mears S.C., Mont M.A., Hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1768-77. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60607-2. Epub 2012 Sep 26. PMID: 23021846.
4. Kurtz S.M., Ong K.L., Lau E., Bozic K.J., Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 16;96(8):624-30. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00285. PMID: 24740658.
5. Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov M.I., Boyarov A.A., Denisov A.O., Shubnyakov I.I., Impact of various factors on the polyethylene wear rate in total hip arthroplasty Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2018;24(1):18-28. DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-1-18-28.
6. Flugsrud G.B., Nordsletten L., Espehaug B., Havelin L.I., Meyer H.E., The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals// Acta Orthop. 2007 Feb;78(1):99-107. DOI: 10.1080/17453670610013493. PMID: 17453400.
7. Schmalzried T.P., Szuszczewicz E.S., Northfield M.R., Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement// The Journal of Bone and Joint surgery. American Volume. 1998 Jan;80(1):54-59. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7739. PMID: 9469309.
8. Heiner A.D., Galvin A.L., Fisher J., Callaghan J.J., Brown T.D., Scratching vulnerability of conventional vs highly cross-linked polyethylene liners because of large embedded third-body particles// J Arthroplasty. 2012 May;27(5):742-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 23. PMID: 22115764; PMCID: PMC3290760.
9. Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov M.I., Boyarov A.A., Riahi A., Shubnyakov I.I., The impact of the acetabular component position on the rate of the polyethylene liner wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: a clinical case Genij Ortopedii. 2020;26(2):238-243. DOI: 10.18019/1028-4427-2020-26-2-238-243.
10. Shubnyakov I.I., Tikhilov R.M., Denisov A.O., Akhmedilov M.A., Cherny A.Z., Totoev Z.A., Javadov A.A., Karpukhin A.S., Muravyeva Y.V., What Has Changed in the Structure of Revision Hip Arthroplasty? Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2019;25(4):9-27. DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-9-27.
11. Marshall A., Ries M.D., Paprosky W., How prevalent are implant wear and osteolysis, and how has the scope of osteolysis changed since 2000?// J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(1):1-6. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200800001-00003. PMID: 18612002.
12. Dumbleton J.H., Manley M.T., Edidin A.A., A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty// J Arthroplasty. 2002 Aug;17(5):649-61. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.33664. PMID: 12168184.
13. Barrack R.L., Folgueras A., Munn B., Tvetden D., Sharkey P., Pelvic lysis and polyethylene wear at 5-8 years in an uncemented total hip// Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Feb;(335):211-7. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199702000-00020. PMID: 9020220.
14. Tabata T., Kaku N., Hara K., Tsumura H., Initial stability of cementless acetabular cups: press-fit and screw fixation interaction--an in vitro biomechanical study// Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Apr;25(3):497-502. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1571-4. Epub 2014 Nov 25. PMID: 25421640; PMCID: PMC4363363.
15. Engh C.A., Hopper R.H. Jr., Engh C.A., Jr. Long-term porouscoated cup survivorship using spikes, screws, and press-fitting for initial fixation// J Arthroplasty. 2004 Oct;19(7 Suppl 2):54-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.004. PMID: 15457419.
16. Röhrl S.M., Nivbrant B., Ström H., Nilsson K.G., Effect of augmented cup fixation on stability, wear, and osteolysis: a 5-year follow-up of total hip arthroplasty with RSA// J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec;19(8):962-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.024. PMID: 15586331.
17. Brodt S., Bischoff K., Schulze M., Nowack D., Roth A., Matziolis G., The use of acetabular screws in total hip arthroplasty and its influence on wear and periacetabular osteolysis in the long-term follow-up// Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):717-722. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05219-7. Epub 2021 Sep 28. PMID: 34581866; PMCID: PMC8930858.
18. Moon N.H., Shin W.C., Do M.U., Kang S.W., Lee S.M., Suh K.T., Wear and osteolysis outcomes for highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene: a 15- to 18-year single-centre follow-up study// Hip Int. 2021 Jul;31(4):526-532. DOI: 10.1177/1120700019896970. Epub 2020 Jan 8. PMID: 31912760.
19. Kim K.W., Yoo J.J., Kim M.N., Kim H.J., Isolated Acetabular Liner Exchange for Polyethylene Wear and Osteolysis with Well-Fixed Metal Shell// Clin Orthop Surg. 2019 Sep;11(3):270-274. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.3.270. Epub 2019 Aug 12. PMID: 31475046; PMCID: PMC6695327.
20. Yoon B.H., Park J.W., Lee Y.K., Koo K.H., Chang C.B., Long-Term Wear-Related Complications of Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis// J Arthroplasty. 2022 Nov;37(11):2308-2315.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 May 12. PMID: 35568139.
21. Shi J., Zhu W., Liang S., Li H., Li S., Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene for Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis// J Invest Surg. 2021 Mar;34(3):307-317. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1606370. Epub 2019 Jul 2. PMID: 31266381.
22. Hadley M., Hardaker C., Isaac G., Fisher J., Wear of different materials for total hip replacement under adverse stop-dwell-start in vitro wear simulation conditions// Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Dec;232(12):1261- 1270. doi: 10.1177/0954411918813385. Epub 2018 Nov 19. PMID: 30453840.
23. Murylev V.Y., Kavalersky G.M., Terentiev D.I., Rukin Y.A., Elizarov P.M., Muzychenkov A.V., Five year outcomes of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in hip joint replacement Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2017;23(1);89-97. DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905- 2017-23-1-89-97.
24. Tsukada S., Wakui M., Kizaki K., Iseki T., Miyao M., Tasaki A., Uncemented total hip arthroplasty using alumina ceramic bearings at a minimum of 14 years of follow-up// Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jul;142(7):1689-1695. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04055-z. Epub 2021 Jul 16. PMID: 34269893.
25. Lee Y.K., Kim K.C., Yoon B.H., Kim T.Y., Ha Y.C., Koo K.H., Cementless total hip arthroplasty with delta-on-delta ceramic bearing in patients younger than 30 years// Hip Int. 2021 Mar;31(2):181- 185. DOI: 10.1177/1120700019889592. Epub 2019 Nov 25. PMID: 31766869.
26. Pawar E.D., Yadav A.K., Sharma A., Harsoor A., Ceramic liner fracture in ceramic on ceramic Total hip arthoplasty: A case report// Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;65:242-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.10.079. Epub 2019 Nov 5. PMID: 31734476; PMCID: PMC6864327.
27. Goretti C., Polidoro F., Paderni S., Belluati A., Ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty and liner fracture. Two case reports and review of literature// Acta Biomed. 2019 Dec 5;90(12-S):192-195. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8961. PMID: 31821308; PMCID: PMC7233715.
28. Mehin R., Yuan X., Haydon C., Rorabeck C.H., Bourne R.B., McCalden R.W., MacDonald S.J., Retroacetabular osteolysis: when to operate?// Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):247-55. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000137562.89722.64. PMID: 15534550.
29. Restrepo C., Ghanem E., Houssock C., Austin M., Parvizi J., Hozack W.J., Isolated polyethylene exchange versus acetabular revision for polyethylene wear// Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan;467(1):194-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0533-8. Epub 2008 Oct 10. PMID: 18846409; PMCID: PMC2600972.
30. Walmsley D.W., Waddell J.P., Schemitsch E.H., Isolated Head and Liner Exchange in Revision Hip Arthroplasty// J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Apr;25(4):288-296. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00144. PMID: 28291145.
31. Berlinberg E.J., Roof M.A., Meftah M., Long W.J., Schwarzkopf R., Outcomes of isolated head-liner exchange versus full acetabular component revision in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty// Hip Int. 2023 Jul;33(4):716-726. DOI: 10.1177/11207000221092127. Epub 2022 Apr 19. PMID: 35438018.
32. Boucher H.R., Lynch C., Young A.M., Engh C.A. Jr, Engh C. Sr., Dislocation after polyethylene liner exchange in total hip arthroplasty// J Arthroplasty. 2003 Aug;18(5):654-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00266- 3. PMID: 12934221.
33. Cheng R., Blevins J., Debbi E.M., Chiu Y.F., Gonzalez Della Valle A., Lee G.C., Contemporary Isolated Bearing Exchange for the Management of Hip Instability Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty// J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S1):S173-S177. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.039. Epub 2024 Mar 24. PMID: 38522800.
34. Mehta N., Selvaratnam V., Alsousou J., Donnachie N., Carroll F.A., Outcome of revision surgery in recurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty// Hip Int. 2021 Sep;31(5):644-648. DOI: 10.1177/1120700020911146. Epub 2020 Mar 11. PMID: 32157907.
35. Sutter E.G., Akram F., Miller A., Paprosky W.G., Berger R.A., Gerlinger T.L., Outcomes of Isolated Head and Liner Exchange Using Large Femoral Heads and Modern Liners in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty// J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1064-1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 20. PMID: 31812483.
36. Wai K.T.L., Cheung A., Fu H., Cheung M.H., Chan P.K., Chiu K.Y., Isolated Liner Exchange in Total Hip Arthroplasty at a Mean of 13 Years of Follow-up: Does Fixation Technique Matter?// J Arthroplasty. 2023 May;38(5):893-898. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Dec 6. PMID: 36493971.
37. Stamenkov R., Neale S.D., Kane T., Findlay D.M., Taylor D.J., Howie D.W., Cemented liner exchange with bone grafting halts the progression of periacetabular osteolysis// J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):822-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Sep 25. PMID: 24074890.
Review
For citations:
Lasunskii S.A., Stafeev D.V., Magomedov M.S., Special'nyj D.V., Denisov A.O., Chugaev D.V. Modular revision for polyethylene insert wear 28 years later after primary total hip arthroplasty: a clinical case. Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics. 2025;(1):59-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2226-2016-2025-1-59-66
JATS XML














