The effect of two- and five—component membranes on the cartilage regeneration rate in the experiment. Substantiate of the laboratory animals rational choice for the experiment
https://doi.org/10.17238/2226-2016-2023-3-7-17
Abstract
Introduction: chondral and osteochondral articular cartilage defects is a significant clinical pathology affecting young, employable population. It's necessary to develop clinical efficacy domestic constructs.
Purpose: to examine the effect of two- and five-component membranes on the properties and rate of cartilage regeneration in the experiment. A literary research was carried out to substantiate the rational choice of experimental animals and the experimental cartilage defects characteristics.
Materials and methods: prospective experimental pilot research. Two study groups were formed (n=13), osteochondral defect models of the rat femur articular surface were surgically created and replaced with two- and five-component membranes developed by Sechenov University. The macroscopic and histological evaluation were performed after euthanasia in terms of 7, 30, 60, 120 days. The defects depth and average value were evaluated at each term. Change of defects depth was measured at each term, the cell density in regenerates was calculated.
Results: both membranes were therapeutically efficacious in the replacement of defects, there was noticed the formation of fibrous cartilage tissue.
Conclusion: the clinical result is satisfactory, further improvement direction of these constructs can be associated with MACI method.
About the Authors
N. O. BelovRussian Federation
Nikita O. Belov – postgraduate student at the Department of traumatology, orthopedics and disaster surgery, assistant at the Department of Life Safety and Disaster Medicine
119991, Moscow
S. G. Radenska-Lovopok
Russian Federation
Stefka G. Radenska-Lopovok - Doctor of Medical Sciences, professor, at the Department of traumatology, orthopedics and disaster surgery
119991, Moscow
A. V. Lychagin
Russian Federation
Alexey V. Lychagin – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of traumatology, orthopedics and disaster surgery
119991, Moscow
P. S. Timashev
Russian Federation
Peter S. Timashev – Doctor of Chemical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Sechenov Biomedical Science & Technology Park, Director of the Institute for Regenerative Medicine
119991, Moscow
G. M. Kavalersky
Russian Federation
Gennadiy M. Kavalersky – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of traumatology, orthopedics and disaster surgery
119991, Moscow
V. I. Tel'pukhov
Russian Federation
Vladimir I. Telpuhov – Doctor of Medical Sciences, professor, at the Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy
119991, Moscow
A. P. Kurpyakov
Russian Federation
Anton P. Kurpyakov – Candidate of Medical Sciences, assistant at the Department of traumatology, orthopedics and disaster surgery
119991, Moscow
M. M. Lipina
Russian Federation
Marina M. Lipina – Candidate of Medical Sciences, assistant professor at Department of traumatology, orthopedics and disaster surgery
119991, Moscow
A. V. Garkavi
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Garkavi – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor
119991, Moscow
A. A. Korneev
Russian Federation
Alexandr A. Korneev – laboratory assistant, medical polymer synthesis laboratory, laboratory of clinical smart nanotechnologies, Sechenov Biomedical Science & Technology Park, Institute for Regenerative Medicine
119991, Moscow
S. V. Zhidkov
Russian Federation
Sergei V. Zhidkov – student at the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine
119991, Moscow
D. A. Pogosyan
Russian Federation
David A. Pogosyan – postgraduate student of the Department of traumatology, orthopedics and disaster surgery, assistant of the Department of Life Safety and Disaster Medicine
119991, Moscow
A. N. Lazarenko
Russian Federation
Anna N. Lazarenko – student at the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine
119991, Moscow
T. V. Bogatov
Russian Federation
Timofey V. Bogatov – student at the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine
119991, Moscow
References
1. Zagorodnij N.V., Vorotnikov A.A., Ajrapetov G.A., Vasjukov V.A. Kompleksnyj podhod k hirurgicheskomu lecheniju hondral’nyh i osteohondral’nyh defektov kolennogo sustava // Opinion leader. 2021;3(44):28-35.
2. Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG. Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy. 1997 Aug;13(4):456-60. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90124-9. PMID: 9276052.
3. STADNIKOV A.A., KAVALERSKIJ G.M., ARHIPOV S.V., PAVLOV V.P., MAKAROV S.A., MAKAROV M.A., ROSKIDAJLO A.A. (2009). NOVYE METODY HIRURGIChESKOGO LEChENIJa DEFEKTOV GIALINOVOGO HRJaShhA KOLENNOGO SUSTAVA U BOL’’NYH GONARTROZOM// NAUChNO-PRAKTIChESKAJa REVMATOLOGIJa, (3), 90-93.
4. Lazishvili G.D., Zatikjan V.R., Shukjur-Zade Je.R., Kornaev A.S., Akmataliev K.I., Danilov M.A. Aktual’nye voprosy hondroplastiki // Vestnik RGMU. 2013;3:13–17.
5. Benedikt L. Proffen; Megan McElfresh; Braden C. Fleming; Martha M. Murray (2012). A comparative anatomical study of the human knee and six animal species., 19(4),0–0. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2011.07.005.
6. Tel’puhov Vladimir Ivanovich, Garkavi Andrej Vladimirovich, Chagin Andrej Stanislavovich, Lychagin Aleksej Vladimirovich, Kyt’ko Olesja Vasil’evna, Zhandarov Kirill Aleksandrovich, Panjushkin Petr Vjacheslavovich, Ibragimova Shabnam Ildyrym Kyzy SOVREMENNYE METODY HONDROPLASTIKI I VOZMOZhNOSTI STIMULJaCII REGENERATIVNYH PROCESSOV SUSTAVNOGO HRJaShhA (ChAST’’ 2) // Medicinskij vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza. 2022. №4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-metody-hondroplastiki-i-vozmozhnosti-stimulyatsii-regenerativnyh-protsessov-sustavnogo-hryascha-chast-2.
7. Lazishvili G.D., Egiazaryan K.A., Nikishin D.V., Voroncov A.A., Shpak M.A., Klinov D.V., Sirotin I.V. EXPERIMENTAL SUBSTANTIATION OF THE USE OF COLLAGEN MEMBRANES FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF FULL-THICKNESS DEFECTS IN HYALINE CARTILAGE. Surgical practice. 2020;(1):45-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38181/2223-2427-2020-1-45-52.
8. Islamov R.A. (2016). Metodologija jeksperimenta s ispol’zovaniem laboratornyh zhivotnyh. Vestnik Kazahskogo Nacional’nogo medicinskogo universiteta, (1), 489-492.
9. «Klinicheskie rekomendacii «Gonartroz» (utv. Minzdravom Rossii), https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/667_1.
10. An YH, Friedman RJ. Animal models of articular cartilage defect. Animal models in orthopaedic research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC; 1999. Стр. 310.
11. Tom Minas, Julie Glowacki, Chapter 2 - Cartilage Repair and Regeneration, Editor(s): Tom Minas, A Primer in Cartilage Repair and Joint Preservation of the Knee, W.B. Saunders, 2011, Pages 8-21, ISBN 9781416066545, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-6654-5.00002-X.
12. Hunziker EB. Biologic repair of articular cartilage. Defect models in experimental animals and matrix requirements. Clin Orthop 1999;367(Suppl.):S135–S46.
13. Reinholz GG, Lu L, Saris DB, Yaszemski MJ, O’Driscoll SW. Animal models for cartilage reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2004 Apr;25(9):1511-21. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00498-8. PMID: 14697854.
14. Hoemann C, Kandel R, Roberts S, Saris DB, Creemers L, Mainil-Varlet P et al (2011) International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) recommended guidelines for histological endpoints for cartilage repair studies in animal models and clinical trials. Cartilage 2(2):153–172.
15. ASTM F2451–05 (2010) Standard Guide for in vivo Assessment of Implantable Devices Intended to Repair or Regenerate Articular Cartilage., ASTM International.
16. Guidance for Industry Preparation of IDEs and INDs for Products Intended to Repair or Replace Knee Cartilage. https://www.fda.gov/media/82562/download
17. Regenerativnaja medicina: uchebnik / pod red. P.V. Glybochko, E.V. Zagajnovoj. Moskva: GJeOTAR-Media, 2023. – 456 s.: il. - DOI: 10.33029/9704-7535-5-REG-2023-1-456. ISBN 978-5-9704-7535-5. Str.191-192.
18. Chu CR, Szczodry M, Bruno S (2010a) Animal models for cartilage regeneration and repair. Tissue Eng B Rev 16(1):105–115.
19. Ahern BJ, Parvizi J, Boston R, Schaer TP. Preclinical animal models in single site cartilage defect testing: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jun;17(6):705-13. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2008.11.008.
20. Hurtig MB, Buschmann MD, Fortier LA, Hoemann CD, Hunziker EB, Jurvelin JS, Mainil-Varlet P, McIlwraith CW, Sah RL, Whiteside RA. Preclinical Studies for Cartilage Repair: Recommendations from the International Cartilage Repair Society. Cartilage. 2011 Apr;2(2):137-52. doi: 10.1177/1947603511401905. PMID: 26069576; PMCID: PMC4300779
21. Rudert M: Histological Evaluation of Osteochondral Defects: Consideration of Animal Models with Emphasis on the Rabbit, Experimental Setup, Follow-Up and Applied Methods. Cells Tissues Organs 2002;171:229-240. doi: 10.1159/000063125.
Review
For citations:
Belov N.O., Radenska-Lovopok S.G., Lychagin A.V., Timashev P.S., Kavalersky G.M., Tel'pukhov V.I., Kurpyakov A.P., Lipina M.M., Garkavi A.V., Korneev A.A., Zhidkov S.V., Pogosyan D.A., Lazarenko A.N., Bogatov T.V. The effect of two- and five—component membranes on the cartilage regeneration rate in the experiment. Substantiate of the laboratory animals rational choice for the experiment. Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics. 2023;(3):7-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2226-2016-2023-3-7-17
JATS XML















