Preview

Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Advanced search

Evolution of treatment tactics for forefoot addition in children from 0 to 18 years old in a Russian city with a population of up to 1 million residents

https://doi.org/10.17238/2226-2016-2024-1-7-13

Abstract

Introduction: the paper presents the differential diagnosis of Metatarsus adductus (MA) in children. Classifications and anatomy features, changes of the foot during the growth, the possibility of the deformity self-correction according to international data are analyzed. The systematic MA treatment and its historical evolution, depending on the age of the patient and the severity of the deformity, are demonstrated.

Aim: to demonstrate the diagnosis protocol and treatment algorithm for children from 0 to 18 years old with MA, accepted in the Yaroslavl region.

Materials and methods: we performed the literature review analysis of the following databases: PubMed, Google Schlolar, Elibrary, Cyberleninka for the last 10 years, and evaluated the results of treatment of children with MA in clinics in Yaroslavl, Russia over the past 20 years. For describing the etiology, pathogenesis, development of diagnostic methods and MA treatment, earlier publications were also used.

Conclusion: the treatment protocol for children with metatarsus adductus, accepted in the Yaroslavl region, takes into consideration the severity of the pathology and the reasonably necessary timing of the treatment start. It allows to correct foot deformity minimizing the amount of surgical treatment.

About the Authors

M. A. Vavilov
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "YaSMU" of the Ministry of Health of Russia; The State Medical Institution of the Regional Children's Clinical Hospita; Clinic LLC “Constanta”
Russian Federation

Maxim Alexandrovich Vavilov – Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of Pediatric Surgery of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of the Ministry of Health of Russia

150000, Yaroslavl region, Yaroslavl, Revolutsionnaya str. 5



I. V. Gromov
The State Medical Institution of the Regional Children's Clinical Hospital; Clinic LLC “Constanta”
Russian Federation

Gromov Ilya Valeryevich – Ph.D. doctor of «Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital»

150042, Yaroslavl region, Yaroslavl city, Tutaevskoe sh., 27



A. G. Sokolov
The State Medical Institution of the Regional Children's Clinical Hospital; Clinic LLC “Constanta”
Russian Federation

Sokolov Alexander Grigoryevich – doctor of the State Medical Institution of the Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital

150042, Yaroslavl region, Yaroslavl city, Tutaevskoe sh., 27



E. N. Soloviev
Clinic LLC “Constanta”
Russian Federation

Solovyova Ekaterina Nikolaevna – doctor of LLC «Clinic Constant»

150003 Yaroslavl region, Yaroslavl city, Pobedy 15



References

1. Yezhov, M.YU. Stopa. Degenerativno-distroficheskiye zabolevaniya sustavov stopy i golenostopnogo sustava: monografiya / M.YU. Yezhov. — N.Novgorod: Remedium-Povolzh’ye, 2011:320].

2. Kardanov A.A. Khirurgicheskaya korrektsiya deformatsiya stopy – Medpraktika – M, 2016.

3. Lapkin YU.A., Konyukhov M.P. Osobennosti lecheniya deformatsiy nizhnikh konechnostey u detey s sistemnymi zabolevaniyami opornodvigatel’nogo apparata // Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im N.N. Priorova. - 2003;10(4):88-93. doi: 10.17816/vto200310488-89.

4. Kolomiyets A.A., Afanas’yev I.V., Korrektsiya i profilaktika privedeniya perednego otdela stopy pri operativnom lechenii bol’nykh s retsidivnoy vrozhdennoy kosolapost’yu, Geniy ortopedii 2006;4.

5. Konyukhov M.P., Lapkin YU.A., Klychkova I.YU., Sposob lecheniya vtorichnoy mnogoploskostnoy deformatsii stop posle operativnoy korrektsii kosolaposti (Patent № RU2226079C2), 2002.

6. Berg EE. A reappraisal of metatarsus adductus and skewfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1185-1196.

7. Bleck EE. Metatarsus adductus: classification and relationship to outcomes of treatment. J Pediatr Orthop. 1983;3:2-9.

8. Browne RS, Paton DE. Anomalous insertion of the tibialis posterior tendon in congenital metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61:74-76.

9. Cappello ‘T, Mosca VS. Metatarsus adductus and skewfoot. Foot Ankle Clin. 1998;3:683-700.

10. Cook DA, Breed AL, Cook T, et al. Observer variability in the radiographic measurement and classification of metatarsus adductus) Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12:86-89.

11. Farsetti P, Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV. The long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of untreated and non-operatively treated metatarsus adductus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76: 257-265.

12. Ghali NN, Abberton M), Silk FF. The management of metatarsus adductus et supinatus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:376-380.

13. Gruber MA, Lozano JA. Metatarsus varus and developmental dysplasia of the hip: is there a relationship? Orthop Trans. 1991;15:336.

14. Hunziker UA, Largo RH, Duc G. Neonatal metatarsus adductus, joint mobility, axis, and rotation of the lower extremity in preterm and term children 0-5 years of age. Eur J Pediatr. 1988; 148:19-23.

15. Jacobs JE. Metatarsus varus and hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop. 1960;16:203-213.

16. Kite JH. Congenital metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49:388-397.

17. Kite JH. Congenital metatarsus varus: report of 300 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950;32(3):500-506.

18. Kollmer CE, Betz RR, Clancy M, et al. Relationship of congenital hip and foot deformities: a national Shriner’s Hospital survey. Orthop Trans. 1991:96.

19. Kumar SJ, MacEwen GD. The incidence of hip dysplasia with metatarsus adductus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;164:234-235.

20. Lincoln CR, Wood KE, Bugg EI Jr. Metatarsus varus corrected by open wedge osteotomy of the first cuneiform bone. Orthop Clin North Am. 1976;7:795.

21. McCauley J Jr, Lusskin R, Bromley J. Recurrence in congenital metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46:525-532.

22. McCormick DW, Blount WP. Metatarsus adductovarus: «skewfoot?» JAMA. 1949;141:449. 25. Morcuende JA, Ponseti IV. Congenital metatarsus adductus in early human fetal development: a histologic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;333:261-266.

23. Mosca VS. Flexible flatfoot and skewfoot. In: Drennan JC, ed. The Child’s Foot and Ankle. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1992:355.

24. Mosca VS. Flexible flatfoot and skewfoot. Instr Course Lect. 1996;45:347-354. Peabody CW, Muro F. Congenital metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1933;15A:171.

25. Ponseti IV, Becker JR. Congenital metatarsus adductus: the results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48:702.

26. Reimann I, Werner HH. The pathology of congenital metatarsus varus: a post-mortem study of a newborn infant. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54:847.

27. Rushforth GF. The natural history of hooked forefoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978;60-B:530-532.

28. Smith JT, Bleck EE, Gamble JG, et al. Simple method of documenting metatarsus adductus. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11:679-680.

29. Staheli LT. Rotational problems in children. J BONE JT SURG SER A 1993;75(6):939-949.

30. Staheli LT. Fundamentals of Pediatric Orthopedics (2015). ISBN:1451193939. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 320 Pages.

31. Thompson SA. Hallux varus and metatarsus varus. Clin Orthop. 1960;16:109.

32. UNFO med ltd. URL: https://ru.unfo-med.com/


Review

For citations:


Vavilov M.A., Gromov I.V., Sokolov A.G., Soloviev E.N. Evolution of treatment tactics for forefoot addition in children from 0 to 18 years old in a Russian city with a population of up to 1 million residents. Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics. 2024;(1):7-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2226-2016-2024-1-7-13

Views: 44

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-2016 (Print)