Preview

Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Advanced search

PREOPERATIVE PLANNING FOR HIP ARTHROPLASTY CONSIDERING THE STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF THE SPINOPELVIC COMPLEX

https://doi.org/10.17238/2226-2016-2024-4-59-67

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is clinically one of the most successful surgeries, with its frequency steadily increasing due to the growing incidence of primary coxarthrosis [1,2]. It is estimated that around 5% of these procedures are complicated by instability and dislocations, despite the positioning of the prosthetic head within the "safe zone" [15-18]. With this prosthesis positioning, complications are most commonly found in patients with a rigid spine [37]. Preoperative assessment, including radiography of the lumbar spine and hip joint in lateral view in standing and sitting positions, with evaluation of sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and other parameters of the spinopelvic complex, allows for more precise planning of prosthesis positioning and reduces the risk of dislocation [13, 19]. Spinal stiffness may be increased in patients over 65 years old, in cases of ankylosing spondylitis, or following prior spinal fusion. In such cases, it is recommended to increase cup inclination and anteversion to compensate for the reduced posterior pelvic tilt in the sitting position [46]. In this review, we present various classifications of spinopelvic complex deformities and recommendations for cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. A more personalized approach can reduce the risk of prosthetic instability and the number of revision surgeries [55].

About the Authors

Yu. A. Kozllova
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Yulia A. Kozllova - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor of Surgery

Moscow;

Head of X-ray diagnostic Department

2nd Botkinsky pr-d, 5, 125284 Moscow



M. P. Pavliv
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Maria P. Pavliv - The resident radiologist

2nd Botkinsky pr-d, 5, 125284 Moscow



V. Yu. Murylev
First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Valery  Yu.  Murylev — Dr. Sci (Med.), Professor, Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Disaster Surgery

St.Trubetskaya, 8/2, 119991 Moscow;

Head of Moscow City Arthroplasty Centre, Botkin Moscow City Hospita

2nd Botkinsky pr-d, 5, 125284 Moscow



P. M. Elizarov
First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Pavel M. Elizarov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor, Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Disaster Surgery

St.Trubetskaya, 8/2, 119991 Moscow;

Orthopaediс Surgeon

2nd Botkinsky pr-d, 5, 125284 Moscow



G. A. Kukovenko
First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Grigory A. Kukovenko — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor, Department of Life Safety and Disaster Medicine

St.Trubetskaya, 8/2, 119991 Moscow;

Orthopaediс  Surgeon

2nd Botkinsky pr-d, 5, 125284 Moscow



A. V. Muzychenkov
First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Aleksey V. Muzychenkov — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Disaster Surgery

St.Trubetskaya, 8/2, 119991 Moscow;

Orthopaediс Surgeon

2nd Botkinsky pr-d, 5, 125284 Moscow



S. S. Alekseev
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Semen S. Alekseev — Orthopaediс Surgeon

2nd Botkinsky pr-d, 5, 125284 Moscow



A. I. Rudnev
First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Aleksander I. Rudnev - Assistant Professor, Department of Life Safety and Disaster Medicine

St.Trubetskaya, 8/2, 119991 Moscow;

Orthopaediс  Surgeon,

2nd Botkinsky pr-d, 5, 125284 Moscow



D. O. Golubkin
First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Dmitriy O. Golubkin — student

St.Trubetskaya, 8/2, 119991 Moscow



References

1. Kukovenko G.A., Elizarov P.M., Alekseev S.S., Sorokina G.L., Ivanenko L.R., Erokhin N.E., Muzychenkov A.V., Murylev V.yu. [Importance of the Algorithm for Diagnosis of Late Deep Periprosthetic Hip Infection]. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and orthopedics of russia]. 2019;25(4):75-87. (In Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-75-87.

2. Sivaloganathan S, Blakeney WG, Vendittoli PA. Modernizing Total Hip Arthroplasty Perioperative Pathways: The Implementation of ERASOutpatient Protocol. J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3293. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123293.

3. Tikhilov R.M., Dzhavadov A.A., Kovalenko A.N., Denisov A.O., Demin A.S., Vahramyan A.G., Shubnyakov I.I. [What Characteristics of the Acetabular Defect Influence the Choice of the Acetabular Component During Revision Hip Arthroplasty?]. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2020;26(2):31-49. (In Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2020-26-2-31-49.

4. Sereda A.P. et al. Epidemiology of hip and knee arthroplasty and periprosthetic infection in the Russian Federation. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2021;27 (3):84-93. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2021-27-3-84-93. (in Russian)

5. Dargel J, Oppermann J, Brüggemann GP, Eysel P. Dislocation following total hip replacement. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Dec 22;111(51-52):884-90. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0884.

6. Shubnyakov I.I., Tikhilov R.M., Denisov A.O., Akhmedilov M.A., Cherny A.Zh., Totoev Z.A., Javadov A.A., Karpukhin A.S., Muravyeva u.V. [What Has Changed in the Structure of Revision Hip Arthroplasty? Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and rthopedics of ussia]. 2019;25(4):9-27. (In Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-9-27.

7. Delaunay C, Hamadouche M, Girard J, Duhamel A; SoFCOT Group. What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in France? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):3863-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2935-5.

8. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):442-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733919.

9. Bozic KJ, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. Risk of complication and revision total hip arthroplasty among Medicare patients with different bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Sep;468(9):2357-62. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1262-3.

10. Kudyashev A.L., Khominets V.V., Shapovalov V.M., Metlenko P.A., Miroevsky M.V., Rezvantsev M.V., Teremshonok A.V. [Features of surgical tactics for patients with coxo-vertebral syndrome]. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2017;(1):132-143. (In Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2017-23-1-132-143.

11. Sereda A.P. Comments to the Article Kudyashev A.L. et al. [Features of Surgical Tactics for Patients With Coxo-Vertebral Syndrome]. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2017;(1):145-151. (In Russian).

12. Vigdorchik JM, Sharma AK, Madurawe CS, Elbuluk AM, Baré JV, Pierrepont JW. Does Prosthetic or Bony Impingement Occur More Often in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Dynamic Preoperative Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2501-2506. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.009.

13. Zagra L, Benazzo F, Dallari D, Falez F, Solarino G, D’Apolito R, Castelli CC. Current concepts in hip-spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2022 Jan 11;7(1):59-69. doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0082.

14. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1978 Mar;60(2):217-220.

15. Abdel MP, von Roth P, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):386-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4432-5.

16. Esposito CI, Gladnick BP, Lee YY, Lyman S, Wright TM, Mayman DJ, Padgett DE. Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jan;30(1):109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.009.

17. Howie DW, Holubowycz OT, Middleton R; Large Articulation Study Group. Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 20;94(12):1095-102. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00570.

18. Amlie E, Høvik Ø, Reikerås O. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Jun;11(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s10195-010-0097-8.

19. Sharma AK, Vigdorchik JM. The Hip-Spine Relationship in Total Hip Arthroplasty: How to Execute the Plan. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S111-S120. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.008.

20. Ike H, Dorr LD, Trasolini N, Stefl M, McKnight B, Heckmann N. Spine-Pelvis-Hip Relationship in the Functioning of a Total Hip Replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 19;100(18):1606-1615. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00403.

21. Le Huec JC, Aunoble S, Philippe L, Nicolas P. Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):564-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1940-1.

22. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J. et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. E Spine J 7, 99–103 (1998). doi:10.1007/s005860050038

23. Philippot R, Wegrzyn J, Farizon F, Fessy MH. Pelvic balance in sagittal and Lewinnek reference planes in the standing, supine and sitting positions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Feb;95(1):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.01.001.

24. Kanawade V, Dorr LD, Wan Z. Predictability of Acetabular Component Angular Change with Postural Shift from Standing to Sitting Position. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 18;96(12):978-986. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00765.

25. Sariali E, Lazennec JY, Khiami F, Catonné Y. Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop. 2009 Jun;80(3):277-82. doi: 10.3109/17453670902988378.

26. Piazzolla A, Solarino G, Bizzoca D, Montemurro V, Berjano P, Lamartina C, Martini C, Moretti B. Spinopelvic parameter changes and low back pain improvement due to femoral neck anteversion in patients with severe unilateral primary hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement. Eur Spine J. 2018 Jan;27(1):125-134. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5033-7.

27. Rivière C, Lazennec JY, Van Der Straeten C, Auvinet E, Cobb J, Muirhead-Allwood S. The influence of spine-hip relations on total hip replacement: A systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Jun;103(4):559-568. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.02.014.

28. Peleganchuk A.V. et al. The influence of spinopelvic relationships on late dislocation of the prosthetic femoral head after total hip arthroplasty. Spine surgery. 2022;19 (1): 63-70. doi: 10.14531/ss2022.1.63-70. (in Russian)

29. Phan D, Bederman SS, Schwarzkopf R. The influence of sagittal spinal deformity on anteversion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1017-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.35700.

30. Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Ames CP, Kebaish K, Hart RA, Farcy JP, Lafage V; International Spine Study Group (ISSG). Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):E803-12. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318292b7b9.

31. Buckland AJ, Fernandez L, Shimmin AJ, Bare JV, McMahon SJ, Vigdorchik JM. Effects of Sagittal Spinal Alignment on Postural Pelvic Mobility in Total Hip Arthroplasty Candidates. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2663-2668. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.036.

32. Langston J, Pierrepont J, Gu Y, Shimmin A. Risk factors for increased sagittal pelvic motion causing unfavourable orientation of the acetabular component in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):845-852. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1599.R1.

33. Innmann M, Verhaegen J, Renkawitz T, Merle C, Grammatopoulos G. How to Screen for Lumbar Spine Stiffness in Patients Awaiting Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan;39(1):124-131. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.006.

34. Lazennec JY, Riwan A, Gravez F, et al. Hip Spine Relationships: Application to Total Hip Arthroplasty. HIP International. 2007;17(5_suppl):91-104. doi:10.1177/112070000701705S12

35. Pierrepont J, Hawdon G, Miles BP, Connor BO, Bare J, Walter LR, et al. Variation in functional pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:184e91. doi: 0.1302/0301-620X.99B2. BJJ-2016 0098.R1.

36. Blizzard DJ, Sheets CZ, Seyler TM, Penrose CT, Klement MR, Gallizzi MA, Brown CR. The Impact of Lumbar Spine Disease and Deformity on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes. Orthopedics. 2017 May 1;40(3):e520-e525. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170327-03.

37. Tsai SHL, Lau NC, Chen WC, Chien RS, Tischler EH, Fu TS, Chen DW. Total hip arthroplasty has higher complication rates in stiff spine patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jul 16;17(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03237-8.

38. Lin D, Charalambous A, Hanna SA. Bilateral total hip arthroplasty in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jul 17;4(7):476-481. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180047.

39. Iyer S, Sheha E, Fu MC, Varghese J, Cunningham ME, Albert TJ, Schwab FJ, Lafage VC, Kim HJ. Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Adult Spinal Deformity: An Overview of Current Concepts and a Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev. 2018 May;6(5):e2. doi: 10.2106/JBJS. RVW.17.00117.

40. Pagan CA, Karasavvidis T, Vigdorchik JM, DeCook CA. Spinopelvic Motion: A Simplified Approach to a Complex Subject. H&P 2024;36:77-86. doi: 10.5371/hp.2024.36.2.77

41. Vigdorchik J, Eftekhary N, Elbuluk A, Abdel MP, Buckland AJ, Schwarzkopf RS, Jerabek SA, Mayman DJ. Evaluation of the spine is critical in the workup of recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7):817-823. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1502.R1.

42. Maratt JD, Esposito CI, McLawhorn AS, Jerabek SA, Padgett DE, Mayman DJ. Pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: when does it matter? J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.014.

43. Lembeck B, Mueller O, Reize P, Wuelker N. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):517-23. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041501.

44. Rousseau MA, Lazennec JY, Boyer P, Mora N, Gorin M, Catonné Y. Optimization of total hip arthroplasty implantation: is the anterior pelvic plane concept valid? J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan;24(1):22-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.015.

45. Loppini M, Longo UG, Ragucci P, Trenti N, Balzarini L, Grappiolo G. Analysis of the Pelvic Functional Orientation in the Sagittal Plane: A Radiographic Study With EOS 2D/3D Technology. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):1027-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.015.

46. Stefl M, Lundergan W, Heckmann N, McKnight B, Ike H, Murgai R, Dorr LD. Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1 Supple A):37-45. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0415.R1.

47. Luthringer TA, Vigdorchik JM. A Preoperative Workup of a “Hip-Spine” Total Hip Arthroplasty Patient: A Simplified Approach to a Complex Problem. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S57-S70. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.012.

48. Lazennec JY, Charlot N, Gorin M, Roger B, Arafati N, Bissery A, Saillant G. Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004 Apr;26(2):136-44. doi: 10.1007/s00276-003-0195-x.

49. Malkani AL, Himschoot KJ, Ong KL, Lau EC, Baykal D, Dimar JR, Glassman SD, Berry DJ. Does Timing of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Prior to or After Lumbar Spine Fusion Have an Effect on Dislocation and Revision Rates? J Arthroplasty. 2019 May;34(5):907-911. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.009.

50. Ochi H, Baba T, Homma Y, Matsumoto M, Nojiri H, Kaneko K. Importance of the spinopelvic factors on the pelvic inclination from standing to sitting before total hip arthroplasty. Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3699-3706. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4217-2.

51. DelSole EM, Vigdorchik JM, Schwarzkopf R, Errico TJ, Buckland AJ. Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Spinal Deformity Population: Does Degree of Sagittal Deformity Affect Rates of Safe Zone Placement, Instability, or Revision? J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1910-1917. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.039.

52. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, Malchau H. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):319-29. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1487-1.

53. Griffin AR, Perriman DM, Bolton CJ, Smith PN. An in vivo comparison of the orientation of the transverse acetabular ligament and the acetabulum. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar;29(3):574-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.002.

54. Ferguson RJ, Palmer AJ, Taylor A, Porter ML, Malchau H, GlynJones S. Hip replacement. Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1662-1671. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31777-X.

55. Sivaloganathan S, Blakeney WG, Rivière C, Vendittoli PA. Evolution of Concepts: Can Personalized Hip Arthroplasty Improve Joint Stability? J Clin Med. 2023 May 7;12(9):3324. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093324.

56. Sereda A.P., Smetanin S.M. [Dislocations after Hip Arthroplasty (Review)]. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2020;26(2):180-200. (In Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2020-26-2-180-200.


Review

For citations:


Kozllova Yu.A., Pavliv M.P., Murylev V.Yu., Elizarov P.M., Kukovenko G.A., Muzychenkov A.V., Alekseev S.S., Rudnev A.I., Golubkin D.O. PREOPERATIVE PLANNING FOR HIP ARTHROPLASTY CONSIDERING THE STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF THE SPINOPELVIC COMPLEX. Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics. 2024;(4):59-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2226-2016-2024-4-59-67

Views: 31

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-2016 (Print)