Clinical case of revision elbow arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting technique in the presence of an extensive cavity defect of the humerus
https://doi.org/10/17238/issn2226-2016.2025.3.15-20
Abstract
Introduction. The most common complication of total elbow arthroplasty in the mid- to long-term period is aseptic loosening of the prosthetic components. This complication is often accompanied by periprosthetic aseptic loosening due to osteolysis of varying severity. In cases of significant osteolysis, impact bone grafting is performed during revision arthroplasty to fill cavitary defects. In this article, we present a clinical case illustrating this approach.
Objective. To describe a clinical case of revision elbow arthroplasty with impact bone grafting for a pronounced cavitary defect of the humerus.
Discussion. To date, the global experience of employing impact bone grafting in elbow arthroplasty is represented by a limited number of observational series; however, it should be noted that this technique allows for the reconstruction of large cavitary defects in the humerus and restoration of elbow joint function.
Conclusion. The use of bone allografts in conjunction with impact bone grafting techniques is an effective method for revision elbow arthroplasty in the presence of significant bone defects. This approach ensures the stability of the construct and the restoration of the joint's functional capabilities, ultimately enhancing the patient's quality of life.
About the Authors
A. V. AmbrosenkovRussian Federation
Ambrosenkov Andrey Vasilyevich, PhD
St. Petersburg, Academician Baykov, 8
T. Z. Kalakaev
Russian Federation
Kalakaev Timur Zazaevich, clinical resident
St. Petersburg, Academician Baykov, 8
A. G. Aliev
Russian Federation
Aliev Alimurad Gazievich, MD, PhD
St. Petersburg, Academician Baykov, 8
A. I. Avdeev
Russian Federation
Avdeev Aleksandr Igorevich, MD, PhD
St. Petersburg, Academician Baykov, 8
A. V. Afanasyev
Russian Federation
Afanasyev Aleksandr Vitalievich, MD, PhD
St. Petersburg, Academician Baykov, 8
A. A. Boyarov
Russian Federation
Boyarov Andrey Aleksandrovich, MD, PhD
St. Petersburg, Academician Baykov, 8
T. A. Yesayan
Russian Federation
Yesayan Tigran Araikovich, clinical resident
St. Petersburg, Academician Baykov, 8
References
1. Chou TA, Ma HH, Wang JH, Tsai SW, Chen CF, Wu PK, Chen WM. Total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):967-980. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1465.R1
2. Samdanis V, Manoharan G, Jordan RW, Watts AC, Jenkins P, Kulkarni R, Thomas M, Rangan A, Hay SM. Indications and outcome in total elbow arthroplasty: A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Oct;12(5):353-361. DOI: 10.1177/1758573219873001
3. Petlenko I.S., Fedyunina S.Yu., Aliev A.G., Bilyk S.S., Zakhmatov N.S., Shubnyakov I.I. Effectiveness of 3D Visualization Technologies in Planning and Performing Reconstructive Plastic Surgeries in Patients with Elbow Contractures Caused by Ossification. Traumatology and orthopedics of Russia. 2024;30(2):120-130 DOI: 10.17816/2311-2905-17531 .
4. Aliev A.G., Ambrosenkov A.V., Boyarov A.A., Zhabin G.I., Javadov A.A. Mid- and Long-Term Results of Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Post-Traumatic Consequences and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2019;25(1):41-51. DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-1-41-51
5. Grandizio LC, Luciani AM, Koshinski JL, Seitz WH Jr. Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2025 Jan;50(1):77-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.09.006.
6. Rhee YG, Cho NS, Parke CS. Impaction grafting in revision total elbow arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening and bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 5;95(11):e741-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01737. PMID: 23780544.
7. Rhee YG, Cho NS, Parke CS. Impaction Grafting in Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening and Bone Loss: Surgical Technique. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2013 Sep 11;3(3):e17. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.M.00018. PMID: 30881748
8. Lee DH. Impaction allograft bone-grafting for revision total elbow arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jul;81(7):1008-12. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00015. PMID: 10428134.
9. King GJ, Adams RA, Morrey BF. Total elbow arthroplasty: revision with use of a non-custom semiconstrained prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Mar;79(3):394-400. PMID: 9070529.
10. Grandizio LC, Luciani AM, Koshinski JL, Seitz WH Jr. Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2025 Jan;50(1):77-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.09.006
11. Geurts EJ, Viveen J, van Riet RP, Kodde IF, Eygendaal D. Outcomes after revision total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Feb;28(2):381-386. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.024
12. Domos P, Chelli M, Papanna MC, Gokaraju K, Stanley D, Ali AA. Outcomes following revision of the revision total elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):1653-1661. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.016.
13. Geurts, E. J., Viveen, J., van Riet, R. P., Kodde, I. F., & Eygendaal, D. (2019). Outcomes after revision total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 28(2), 381–386. DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.024
14. Loebenberg MI, Adams R, O'Driscoll SW, Morrey BF. Impaction grafting in revision total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jan;87(1):99-106. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.B.00038. PMID: 15634819.
Review
For citations:
Ambrosenkov A.V., Kalakaev T.Z., Aliev A.G., Avdeev A.I., Afanasyev A.V., Boyarov A.A., Yesayan T.A. Clinical case of revision elbow arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting technique in the presence of an extensive cavity defect of the humerus. Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics. 2025;(3):15-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10/17238/issn2226-2016.2025.3.15-20
JATS XML















